Home Get Funding The Best Reason for Democrats Ending the Shutdown Now: CHIP Funding

The Best Reason for Democrats Ending the Shutdown Now: CHIP Funding

10 min read

On Monday, soon after noon, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
announced that he and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had reached a deal
to end the shutdown of the government, and to keep it open
until February 8th. Schumer portrayed this as a victory, because, he
said, McConnell had promised to bring legislation to the floor to
address the plight of the Dreamers—young, undocumented Americans brought
to the country as children—with a fair debate. That is an opening, not
an ending; McConnell has worked his way out of such promises before. At
the same time, Schumer quickly passed over the most solid victory in the
bill to end the shutdown: six years of funding for the Children’s Health
Insurance Program, or CHIP. This means that the nine million children
who rely on CHIP are no longer on the brink of losing their coverage.
(Funding for it officially ran out at the end of September, and it has
kept going since then only thanks to the budgetary equivalent of
scrounging and foraging.) That is something that Democrats should be
celebrating—even as it might cause them to reflect on whether they
miscalculated in letting the government shut down in the first place.

The CHIP money is not a new addition to the Monday deal. It was in the
bill that failed on Friday, when all but five Democrats (along with five
Republicans, including, for parliamentary reasons, McConnell) voted
against it, triggering the shutdown. (One of those five Democrats,
Senator Doug Jones, of Alabama, fresh from defeating Roy Moore in a
special election, cited the “strong commitment” that he had made to CHIP on the campaign trail as his reason for doing so.) Partly as a result,
the matter of CHIP, which had, in the past few months, been a rallying
cry for Democrats, has, in the past few days, been turned against them,
with Republicans baldly claiming that Democrats don’t care about
children’s health. (“The Democrats are turning down services and
security for citizens in favor of services and security for
non-citizens. Not good!” Trump tweeted on Monday morning.) This is
utterly cynical demagoguery—especially as it was accompanied by a truly
shameful ad released over the weekend by Trump’s reëlection-campaign committee (which is
already at work) asserting that Democrats would
be “complicit” in any murders committed by undocumented perpetrators. What anything in the bill had to do
with such theoretical murders was obscure. And there is something
enraging about McConnell, who had stalled for months on bringing CHIP to
the Senate floor, piously reminding his colleagues how “vulnerable”
these children are. But it’s also a move that the Democrats should have
seen coming, and should have had a better plan for addressing. Instead,
Democratic senators just kept pointing out how hypocritical and sneaky
the G.O.P. was being. For many Americans, though, that charge is not a
news flash when applied to politicians of either party.

The expiration date for the final Dreamer protections is in early March. Each day brings more uncertainty for those who were formerly protected
by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which Trump
renounced; thousands have not, for one reason or another, had their
status renewed. They deserve that the remaining weeks be used
productively, not squandered. The Friday bill would have kept the
government open only four more weeks, and so allowed time for another
showdown—at which point there might have been an actual deal on the
table; at the moment, there is not. If anything, having CHIP finally
taken care of leaves the Democrats in a stronger position for hard
negotiations: they are less vulnerable to extortion, and to the pressure
of children, state by state, being shut out of doctors’ offices. Each
state has its own program and eligibility formula for CHIP, with
different calendars and, in some cases, with more of a potential
backstop in Medicaid (though states could cut back there, too). But more
than a million and a half children were expected to lose coverage in the
next few weeks. Many states had already sent out letters to families
telling them not to count on CHIP for their children’s care, the kind of
message that leaves any parent feeling helpless, humiliated, lost,

The decision of the Republican leadership to put long-term CHIP funding
in the bill was a bluff that the Democrats could and should have called
earlier. There is no actual logic in portraying votes like those of the
Democrats who voted Friday to keep the government open as a betrayal of
the Dreamers, or as a trade-off of one group or the other—even if some
Democrats themselves saw it that way. But they could have taken that win
without compromising their position on immigration—it would have done so
less than Schumer’s notion of helping Trump build his wall. And
McConnell’s commitments now are too tenuous to explain why it was worth
the risk that CHIP would be taken off the table.

What should be discouraging for anyone who hopes that the Democrats can
close a deal for the Dreamers—and, beyond that, present a coherent
program that Americans can vote for in 2018 and 2020—is how clumsy it
all was. Negotiating with Trump surely is, as Schumer complained, like
trying to handle Jell-O. Trump really is an extremist on immigration,
one who has surrounded himself with hard-liners like John Kelly, his
chief of staff, and his policy aide Stephen Miller. So what’s the plan?
CHIP has been funded; the focus now is on protecting Dreamers, and the
question is how to do it. What did the Democratic Party’s leadership
think it won with this shutdown? And what will it get next time around?

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Are there any reasons left to invest in Stellar Lumens (XLM) right now?

Spread the love So you’re looking for a cryptocurrency that can capture your interes…